Difference between revisions of "MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | |title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | ||
|info=[http://www.oroboros.at/?Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways] | |info=[http://www.oroboros.at/?Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways], [[MiPNet10.05]] | ||
|authors=Gnaiger E | |authors=Gnaiger E | ||
|year=2010 | |year=2010 | ||
Revision as of 15:00, 9 January 2013
| Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - New edition: Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1. |
» Gnaiger 2012 MitoPathways, MiPNet10.05
Gnaiger E (2010) Mitochondr Physiol Network
Abstract: In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics.
• O2k-Network Lab: AT_Innsbruck_OROBOROS
Labels:
Coupling state: OXPHOS
HRR: Oxygraph-2k, Protocol"Protocol" is not in the list (Oxygraph-2k, TIP2k, O2k-Fluorometer, pH, NO, TPP, Ca, O2k-Spectrophotometer, O2k-Manual, O2k-Protocol, ...) of allowed values for the "Instrument and method" property., MiPNet-Publication"MiPNet-Publication" is not in the list (Oxygraph-2k, TIP2k, O2k-Fluorometer, pH, NO, TPP, Ca, O2k-Spectrophotometer, O2k-Manual, O2k-Protocol, ...) of allowed values for the "Instrument and method" property.
O2k-SOP
