Difference between revisions of "MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Publication | {{Publication | ||
|title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | |title=Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - ''New edition:'' [[Gnaiger_2012_MitoPathways|Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1]]. | ||
|info=[[Media:MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux.pdf|'''Open Access-MiPNet10.05.pdf''']]; | |info=[[Media:MiPNet10.05 O2-Concentration-Flux.pdf|'''Open Access-MiPNet10.05.pdf''']]; [http://www.bioblast.at/index.php/File:MiPNet10.05_O2-Concentration-Flux.pdf Versions] [[Image:O2k-Protocols.jpg|right|150px|link=http://www.oroboros.at/?o2k-protocols|O2k-Protocols contents]] | ||
|year=2005 | |year=2005 | ||
|journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network | |journal=Mitochondr Physiol Network |
Revision as of 13:03, 29 October 2013
Gnaiger E (2005-2010) From oxygen concentration to oxygen flux. Mitochondr Physiol Network 10.05. - New edition: Gnaiger 2012 Chapter 1. |
» Open Access-MiPNet10.05.pdf; Versions
Abstract: O2k-Protocol for Oxygen flux In a closed oxygraph chamber, the oxygen concentration declines over time as a result of respiratory processes. The time derivative, therefore, is a negative number. Why is then the ‘rate of oxygen consumption’ not expressed as a negative value? Why is the term ‘oxygen flux’ used in this context of chemical reactions? The rationale is based on fundamental concepts of physical chemistry and non-equilibrium thermodynamics.
- >> O2k-Protocols:Overall contents
- >> Product: OROBOROS Oxygraph-2k, O2k-Catalogue
• Keywords: Archive
• O2k-Network Lab: AT_Innsbruck_OROBOROS
Labels:
HRR: Protocol"Protocol" is not in the list (Oxygraph-2k, TIP2k, O2k-Fluorometer, pH, NO, TPP, Ca, O2k-Spectrophotometer, O2k-Manual, O2k-Protocol, ...) of allowed values for the "Instrument and method" property.
O2k-SOP